Welcome To BallardNewsTribune.com Updated As Warranted

Local News









Is Denny's building a landmark?

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Rhapsody Partners, the development firm that wants to tear down a Ballard Denny's Restaurant to build a six-to-eight story condominium, plans to nominate the 1960's building for landmark status.

"We want to make sure that things are going the way they are supposed to go," said Katie Vance, a partner with the Kirkland-based developer.

A well-known Bay Area architect, Clarence Mayhew, designed the building at 15th Avenue Northwest and Northwest Market Street. It was built in 1964 as a Manning's Cafeteria, a local family-owned chain that has since gone out of business.

Often referred to as a long-time hangout for "old Ballard," the style of the building, with its curled A-frame roof, is a post World War II architecture style called "Googie." It is reminiscent of the roadside style first popular in the Los Angeles area, with bold angles and sweeping cantilevered roofs.

Since anyone can nominate a building for conservation 25 years or older with Seattle's Landmark Preservation Board, it's common for developers to do so first in order to save time and money, said Sarah Sodt, landmark coordinator for downtown.

"They want to know whether it will be designated or not as soon as possible," Sodt said. "It gives them the ability to start planning for the future depending on the (board's) determination."

Nominating the building is a way to remove all "incumbrances" on the project and avoid costly delays if construction had to stop for any reason, said Louie Richmond, a spokesman for Rhapsody.

"That's what every developer wants to avoid," said Richmond, chief executive officer of Richmond Public Relations. "When (the developer) starts to build they want to make sure they can proceded in a judicious way."

In some cases, if a building is more than 50 years old or there's a significant public interest in preserving the site, a standard environmental review can force a landmark nomination. A failed nomination can't be appealed for at least five years, except by the owner.

Scott Kemp, the city's land use planner for the project, said he hasn't received any comments from the public asking that the site be preserved.

"People seem to be more used to change than they used to be," Kemp said.

The project has also been criticized by a nearby developer and community members for not being walkable enough, but Richmond said Rhapsody is "very interested in making it pedestrian and neighborhood friendly."

"The design is not final...it goes through many, many changes," he said.

The site was purchased from the failed Seattle Monorail Project, which planned to build a station there for the 14-mile elevated line.

Bob Derry, former staff member for the Seattle Monorail, said all the properties purchased by the organization were studied for landmark status, including the Denny's building. The "cafeteria with a funny roof" was found to have no historical, archeological or indigenous significance, he said.

Rhapsody first hired Seattle historian and author Mildred Andrews to research the building further, but ended her contract after she submitted her preliminary report. Andrews wasn't willing to disclose her findings just yet, but said, "It's a very interesting building."

Preservation architect Larry Johnson is now consulting with Rhapsody's architects and will write the landmark nomination. His goal is to "stick to facts, not conjecture," Johnson said. "There's no room for speculation."

Johnson, a former chair of the Ballard Avenue Landmark Board, was also hesitant to reveal any of his findings about the building while under contract with the developers.

"My job is to report the facts," he said. "My opinion only enters in when I write a landmark nomination."

Richmond said Rhapsody is somewhat confident the site will not pass a nomination.

"Rhapsody feels the site indeed is not a landmark," he said. "What they want to do is vastly improve the lot."

Johnson is concerned that nominating a building for historic status has become the new way to fight unwanted development.

"I think all these fights - we're reacting to change, such rapid change," he said.

The city's all-volunteer landmark board already has its hands full with considering the designation of 38 downtown buildings, he said, and their time shouldn't be used inefficiently.

"We're scraping the bottom of the barell (sometimes)," Johnson said. "We can't keep everything and we shouldn't be throwing everything out either."

Rebekah Schilperoort may be reached at 783.1244 or rebekahs@robinsonnews.com


Please share your point of view on this story. Comments posted with full names will be considered for publication in the print edition. You may request that your name not be published.


DTStellwagen wrote on Jan 6, 2008 8:50 AM:

" Mickymse's statement about the property disposal preceedure has been reported many times by others, but I am suprised that original owners haven't filed suits against the SPMA for not paying market value for the properties. "

Sargon wrote on Jan 3, 2008 7:01 PM:

" BUILDERnews
Published September 2007

Seattle mayor Greg Nickels recently announced a new program called Seattle Homes Within Reach, an initiative that works to make more homes attainable to working-class people. The program expands an existing housing incentive and provides a 12-year tax exemption for apartment complexes that set aside 20 to 25 percent of the units for single persons and families who make $49,000 and $62,300 per year, respectively. A similar incentive is also available to condominium developers.

A plan by Kirkland-based Rhapsody Partners to demolish a Denny’s Restaurant located on the corner of 15th Avenue N.W. and N.W. Market Street in Ballard and redevelop the site into a 250-unit condominium complex with retail space is receiving opposition. Ballard Chamber of Commerce executive director Beth Miller says a car-dependent business along Market Street is not consistent with the community’s pedestrian friendly philosophy. Additionally, the architectural history of the building, which was formerly a Manning’s Cafeteria, could make it eligible as a landmark.
__________________________

The Denny’s property was one of many commercial properties purchased for the Seattle Monorail Project.

After the purchase of numerous multi-million dollar commercial real estate parcels to be used for Monorail stations along the planned Monorail Green Line route, Greg Nickels and his accomplices on the Seattle Monorail Authority Board attempted to dupe Seattle with a "fixed" unauthorized ballot measure to kill the Monorail Project and flip those properties in furtherance of their own agendas and self-interests after the people of Seattle had in good faith invested some $200 million dollars toward the goal of a citizen-initiated voter-approved citywide Monorail transportation system.

The City of Seattle Attorney's Office and the Seattle Popular Monorail Authority admit that the "fixed" 2005 Seattle Prop. 1 Monorail Project ending ballot measure was not a legal vote and they do not deny that they are trying to shut down the Seattle Monorail Project illegally. So just what are they doing?

What Mr. Nickels and his cohorts are trying to do is railroad the dissolution of the SMP through and redevelop those station sites as quickly as possible to further obstruct the construction of the Monorail transportation system lawfully mandated by the citizens of Seattle.

A criminal complaint was lodged against Monorail Authority Board members and probable cause to consider whether crimes involving fraud were committed by the SPMA was immediately found by the judge reviewing the complaint. SPMA Board members were then served with a criminal charging document requiring them to appear and answer to the charges. A couple of weeks later, an undisclosed hearing was held exclusively for SPMA legal counsel in the courthouse. There the criminal complaint was dismissed without lawful justification before the SPMA had made an answer.

Lawsuits addressing the illegal shutdown of the Seattle Monorail Project are currently in the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Judges in the trial court attempted to dismiss these lawsuits without legal foundation (conclusions of law).

The Court of Appeals has affirmed trial court orders of dismissal lacking legal foundation without legal foundation of their own for doing so. And, they have stalled our lawsuit concerning the election of new Board members to the SPMA, that was to take place in 07 per the legal public vote on 2005 Prop. 2, for months saying they had trouble all that time "opening the computer file".

I guess if you have an strong aversion to left-clicking the mouse to open a particular computer file, that could be called "trouble". How did they acquire this aversion? Telephone? . interoffice memo? . . red flag?

Be sure to look for the next exciting edition of: "The Great Seattle Monorail Rip-Off".
"

Mickymse wrote on Sep 6, 2007 3:56 PM:

" For the record, the monorail authority was forced UNDER STATE LAW to accept bids from the public and to sell to the highest bidder. Turning property back over to previous owners was simply not an option no matter how much they would have liked to in some cases... "

Tomas wrote on Sep 5, 2007 10:13 AM:

" Historic building or not tearing down this Ballard icon to put up more CONDOS is just wrong! First of all, let's take a look at why this is taking place to begin with. Years ago the city forced the owners of Denny's to sell their property for the monorail (eminent domain and all). But then when the monorail was not built did they offer to give back the land at the price they paid? Hell no! The city put the land up for general auction and took the highest bidder, which happened to be a condo developer. How would you feel if the city took your home, didn't use it for anything and then sold it off for a nice profit a couple years later, forcing you to move? Don't even get me started on the fact that the monorail was voted "YES" on multiple times over many years and not built, but with one "NO" vote the whole project was scrapped within months. Anyway back to the condo issue. Many of our small businesses are being torn down so condos can be built. We should pass an ordenence to limit condo development in Ballard. I'm not going to enjoy more crowded bars, restaraunts and other public locations. More folks crowding the bus in the morning and more parking spots to fight over. Especially at the cost of loosing businesses that make ballard a good place to live. "

(optional)
printable version e-mail this story


This Week's Headlines
Stories with Video
WXPort

Ballard
Traffic Cams
85th & Aurora

Sponsored Links